Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
June 18, 2012
Image Size
1.2 MB
Resolution
771×1077
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,988
Favourites
58 (who?)
Comments
38
Downloads
154
×
Child Labor Laws? Who Needs 'Em! by poasterchild Child Labor Laws? Who Needs 'Em! by poasterchild
Please disseminate widely, thank you! This does not give permission to alter or claim credit for this re-mixed work, for which I retain all copyrights. The original illustration is in the public domain.

If you disagree with the views expressed here, please be sure to read my Policy Statement BEFORE you post: [link]


Republican governors and state lawmakers, who succeeded this year in curbing union powers, are pushing to revise their child-labor laws to help companies such as groceries get workers. Wisconsin will let employers treat teenagers as adults in pay and hours, and Maine lawmakers want to let companies keep teens working longer hours.

The moves pose a challenge to child-labor laws, established at the federal level in 1938 to protect youths from working long hours on dangerous machinery instead of going to school. Republicans and businesses easing the restrictions as part of their effort to cut back government regulation while giving teenagers a chance to learn valuable work habits.

“How come it’s OK, even exemplary, for teenagers to spend 40 hours a week in sports, glee club, chorus, debate society, or any other select activity sanctioned by the social elite, but if you are a teenager who wants to work or needs to work, there are limits?” Dick Grotton, president of the Maine Restaurant Association, based in Augusta, said in an interview. “Kids working is not a bad thing.”

The U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act sets a minimum age of 14 for most work and bars children under 18 from hazardous jobs. The law remained intact after the Supreme Court knocked down a challenge in 1941, and its champions say Gingrich is leading an effort to undermine it. Some states such as Maine have laws that exceed federal requirements, and Republican legislators are targeting the state regulations.

‘Anti-Worker Policies’

“This is part of a coordinated effort by conservatives across the country to use the economic crisis to shred critical worker protections,” Anne Thompson, a policy analyst at the National Employment Law Project, a Washington-based group that advocates for worker rights, said in an interview.

Romney’s Position

“To have kids work in the library and to help out in school and to clean the blackboards does not require changing our child-labor laws,” Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who is the presumptive Republicans nominee for President, said during an Iowa debate earlier this year.
Wal-Mart, McDonald’s

Easing child-labor laws would most benefit companies that employ low-wage workers, including retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and operators of fast-food restaurants such as McDonald’s, according to Thompson of the National Employment Law Project.

Greg Rossiter, a spokesman for Wal-Mart, declined to comment. Danya Proud, a spokeswoman for McDonald’s, didn’t respond to phone and e-mail requests for comment.

Representative George Miller of California, the top Democrat on the House Labor and Workforce Committee, said in an interview that attacks on child-labor laws are about “demonizing the poor.”

“A kid with a parent working two low-wage jobs to pay the rent knows what a work ethic is,” he said. “She doesn’t need any more hard knocks from the likes of Newt Gingrich. What she needs is access to great education and her parents need a vibrant job market. You get neither when you repeal child-labor laws and replace Mom and Dad with underage children.”

In Maine, Republicans lawmakers rolled back child-labor laws this year, with backing from Governor Paul LePage. Legislation increased the number of hours teenagers could work and let companies pay them a “training wage.” Under the pay measure, workers younger than 20 would earn $5.25 an hour, less than the state’s $7.50 an hour minimum wage.

Working at 14

“I don’t see why kids can’t go to work when they are 14 or 15 -- it makes no sense to me,” LePage said in an October interview with the Augusta-based Capitol News Service.

Wisconsin rolled back state laws this year limiting the hours 16- and 17-year-olds can work. Wisconsin and Maine changed their laws in response to lobbying by groups representing restaurants and grocery stores, which said restricting teenage labor burdened businesses with cumbersome paperwork.
“It wasn’t like they were trying to overwork these kids or create a sweatshop,” said Michelle Kussow, a lobbyist for the Wisconsin Grocers Association. “They just want to give kids that great first opportunity you get in a grocery store.”

In Missouri, Republican State Senator Jane Cunningham sought unsuccessfully this year to eliminate a ban on employment of children younger than 14. She doesn’t plan to try again, according to Kit Crancer, Cunningham’s chief of staff.

In Utah, first-term Republican U.S. Senator Mike Lee, who is supported by groups affiliated with the Tea Party, posted a video on his YouTube channel, saying the federal child-labor law violates the Constitution.

The federal law is “an interference with how parents chose to raise their kids,” he said.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconapocalitico:
apocalitico Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2014
sweet...this is great poster. 
Reply
:iconpoasterchild:
poasterchild Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
Thanks so much.
Reply
:iconquamp:
quamp Featured By Owner Aug 1, 2012
Who knows where society would be had this been outlawed earlier? Life expectancy is much lower for people who start work before age 16.
However, as long as someone can profit from it, there will be someone who will be in favor of dumb ideas.
Reply
:iconrozax:
Rozax Featured By Owner Jun 20, 2012
I'm glad this is being evaluated. Thanks to "stranger danger" and "no child left behind", I feel I was seriously cheated in my childhood. My parents bought into "stranger danger", so I wasn't allowed outside after dark (which is a problem, in Wisconsin; thank God we weren't living in Alaska), which meant I couldn't hold a job, and I wasn't allowed to babysit unless one of them was home. What could they do for me when they were way over in our own little abode? No idea; but it made them feel better. And the less said on NCLB, the better – that's another (yet oddly complementary, when you get down to it) big ol' hot ball of wax.

As for the minimum wage...that's disgusting. You are a legal adult at the age of 18, and in this day and age, we are expected to be in college. Tell me, how cheap do they think tuition is, let alone all those books and materials? Oh, right...FAFSA. Thanks. I'm so happy to be paying off student loans for the next decade, because I couldn't earn enough while I was in school. I wasn't planning on putting that money toward anything useful, anyway.
Reply
:iconxopumpkinlovexo:
xoPumpkinLovexo Featured By Owner Jun 19, 2012
This is ridiculous! Everyone under 20?! What about the people just turning 18 that have to make ends meet? What about TEENAGE MOMS?!
Reply
:icontheamazingneard:
theamazingneard Featured By Owner Jun 25, 2012
A teenager shouldn't become a mother unless someone can support her financially.
Reply
:iconxopumpkinlovexo:
xoPumpkinLovexo Featured By Owner Jun 25, 2012
right, otherwise let those bitches starve. *SARCASM*
Reply
:icontheamazingneard:
theamazingneard Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2012
They shouldn't have a kid if they aren't ready. Don't have sex if you aren't ready, stops the issue.
Reply
:iconxopumpkinlovexo:
xoPumpkinLovexo Featured By Owner Jul 12, 2012
So the world you would like is completely without compassion or understanding? No one's allowed to make mistakes in their life or else? I pray to almighty God that you or your daughter will go to some frat party, get drunk, and knocked up by some douche with no money that leaves you flat so you can eat your PUTRID words.
Reply
:icontheamazingneard:
theamazingneard Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2012
I don't drink, so that won't happy, nor do I have a daughter. "Compassion" as you want it goes against nature, Darwinism is the way. If you reject nature, you are being stupid.
Reply
Add a Comment: